Getting to Know Writ Jurisdiction
The authority held by the Supreme Court of India is crucial, within the system of the nation as it safeguards rights and upholds the rule of law. Article 32 of the Indian Constitution grants individuals the privilege to directly seek redress, from the Supreme Court in cases where their fundamental rights are infringed upon. This provision elevates the Supreme Court to a position where it serves as a custodian of the Constitution and a defender of liberties.
Dr B.R Ambedkar highlighted Article 32 as an element of the Indian Constitution. Described it as the core foundation of the document itself This particular article empowers the Supreme Court to issue writs and also enshrines the right, to constitutional remedies as an inherent fundamental right The Supreme Court exercises its writ jurisdiction to oversee that governmental bodies operate within boundaries and uphold the rights of individuals. Jurionex Legal Services
Read More About : How to Send a Legal Notice to Tenant to Vacate Premises in India
The legal foundation, for the authority of writ jurisdiction, in the constitution
The authority of the Supreme Court to issue writs stems from Article 32 of the Constitution which ensures the right, to remedies for individuals to seek help when their basic rights are violated.The Supreme Courts writ jurisdiction is confined to issues related to rights; in contrast the High Courts have a scope under Article 226 to grant writ relief, for both fundamental and other legal rights.
Article 32 is important because it allows citizens to go to the Supreme Court of dealing with lower courts when they need to enforce their rights quickly and efficiently.This provision serves as a protection, against government actions. Makes sure that justice is promptly served without getting stuck in procedural hurdles.The Supreme Court has the power to examine and invalidate any laws,policies or actions by the government if they are found to be unconstitutional, through its writ jurisdiction.
Varieties of orders according to Article 32
The Supreme Court has the authority to issue five kinds of writs in order to safeguard rights and uphold justice effectively. One of these writ types is known as the writ of Habeas Corpuswhich serves the purpose of securing the freedom of an individual who has been detained unlawfully. This particular writ requires the entity detaining the individual to bring them before the court and provide an explanation, for their detention. In cases where it’s determined that the detention is unjustified or illegal, by the courts judgment the immediate release of the detained person is ordered. This document serves as an asset, in protecting freedom and has played a crucial role in instances of unlawful detentions and breaches of custodial rights.
The next type of writ is known as Mandamus. It instructs an authority or government official to carry out a duty they have neglected to do far based on the law in place; this legal remedy is utilized when a public official fails to carry out their mandated duties as required by law and cannot be used in cases where the duty is discretionary, in nature; primarily employed to ensure that government entities adhere to their legal obligations and operate within the confines of the law.
The third writ is known as Prohibition. It aims to prevent courts or tribunals from overstepping their boundaries set by the law. When a lower court goes beyond its authority or acts improperly the Supreme Court has the power to issue a writ of prohibition to halt the proceedings before they reach a decision. This writ is intended as a measure to guarantee that judicial institutions adhere to their designated boundaries.
The fourth type of writ known as Certioraribears resemblance, to prohibition in its purpose of correction, than prevention It is utilized to invalidate an order or judgment handed down by a court or tribunal that has overstepped its jurisdiction or disregarded principles of fairness and natural justice Prohibition halts an ongoing legal proceeding while certiorari overturns a decision that has already been rendered This legal instrument is put in place to prevent lower courts from acting capriciously and to ensure the fair administration of justice
The last document is called Quowarranto. It is used to contest the legitimacy of someones assertion to a government position. If someone is, in a government role, without authorization the court can step in. Question their right to be there. This document stops people from holding government positions. Makes sure only those who are legally qualified occupy positions of authority.
The Supreme Court has authority to issue writ jurisdiction. Is not unrestricted, in its powers.The Supreme Court utilizes this authority for upholding rights outlined in Part III of the Constitution.This contrasts with High Courts that can issue writ jurisdiction for upholding both other rights, under Article 226; the Supreme Courts purview only extends to violations of fundamental rights.
The Supreme Courts writ jurisdiction plays a role, in safeguarding individuals rights and upholding responsibilities through measures like Habeas Corpus for protecting personal freedom and Mandamus for ensuring official duties are fulfilled properly. Certain rules govern the use of writ jurisdiction; for instance res judicare principle avoids litigation of the matter, in writ petitions. Furthermore legal orders such, as Prohibition and Certiorari necessitate the absence of any legal recourse before they can be authorized.
One significant restriction is when the Supreme Court might decline to consider a writ petition if there is another recourse for the individual to seek relief through an appeal or a lower court proceeding first, as, per the directive of the Supreme Court itself to exhaust such options initially before resorting to writ jurisdiction in situations where no other effective remedy is available.
Read More About : Legal Advisory Services
Jurisdiction in Administrative Law
In the field of law the authority granted to issue writ s is vital, in overseeing that public agencies stay within their boundaries. The Supreme Court employs its power to issue writ s to curb any abuse of authority by government officials and maintain openness and responsibility in governance. Writ s, like Mandamus are frequently utilized to urge agencies to carry out their responsibilities whereas Certiorari and Prohibition deter rulings made by administrative entities.
In a scenario where a government official denies issuing a business license without providing justification to do so; an individual affected by this can take action by filing a writ petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus for resolution. Likewise if a tribunal makes a decision that goes against fairness norms; the Supreme Court has the authority to issue a Writ of Certiorari to overturn decision. These legal writs play a role, in ensuring that administrative bodies operate within the bounds of the law and safeguard the rights of citizens effectively.
Significant Legal Cases Involving Writ Jurisdiction
There have been legal cases that have influenced how the Supreme Court uses its power to issue orders known as writs.One of the cases is the 1973case of Keshavananda Bharati, v.State of Kerala where the Basic Structure Doctrine was introduced and emphasized the importance of review, through writs.This case emphasized that certain core aspects of the Constitution should not be changed and highlighted the importance of using writs to safeguard principles.
In another instance, from Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978) the scope of the right to life and personal freedom as per Article 21 was broadened significantly by the Supreme Courts verdict. The court highlighted that the freedom to travel abroad is intrinsic to liberty and any limitations, on it should adhere to natural justice principles. This case served to reinforce the importance of Habeas Corpus in safeguarding liberties.
The Supreme Court decision, in the case of Sunil Batra v Delhi Administration (1978) showcased the use of the Habeas Corpus writ to protect prisoners rights and prevent treatment within prison walls by emphasizing the extension of rights, beyond prison boundaries and condemning custodial violence as a breach of constitutional safeguards.
In a precedent, from 1967 known as the case of Golak Nath vs State of Punjab the Supreme Court established that fundamental rights are beyond the reach of parliamentary amendments, in Indias constitutional framework.This particular case highlighted the role played by the Supreme Courts writ jurisdiction in safeguarding.
The authority of the Supreme Court, under Article 32 plays a role in upholding rights and upholding legal orderliness in society by granting direct access to individuals seeking justice when their rights are infringed upon and offering an efficient solution, against any actions that go against the constitutions provisions.High Courts operating under Article 226 have a range of authority compared to the Supreme Court as they are empowered to address issues related to both rights and legal rights.
The five different types of orders. Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari and Quo warranto re tools for courts to step in preventing unjust state actions and safeguarding personal freedoms. Even though there are some boundaries the Supreme Courts authority, over these orders stands as a mechanism, in upholding democracy making sure that the government is responsible and citizens rights are protected.
Author By: Gayathri Viswan K.